I often think of space as a continuum of time and galaxies, unexplored with no boundaries or structure. I look at space with my high-powered telescope and do my own exploration, and investigation of the vast conundrum of meticulous platforms of dark matter and bright stars.

But, let’s explore exactly what might exist with a comparison study of two topics that have more parallels then you might think.

β€œIn my eyes, it speaks to how love has color but color-blind, it has depth but is timeless, it has momentum but stead-fast, it can be stifling, but gives life, it’s structured but effortless, it can be simplistic but also multi-faceted like a diamond πŸ’Žβ€

How often do we give of ourselves with the hope and understanding that a person truly understands who we are. We roll the dice of the continuous roulette wheel, giving our heart to a person, a stranger that we don’t know the outcome. Is the result a few dollars set aside that was factored in to lose, or is it gambling with your heart with a person that might not truly be in the game, but just visiting the casino taking a chance on hitting it big with the Jackpot 🎰 .

Do they understand the severity of your love language or is it just a vast Galaxy not yet explored or understood. Are you assuming that there love for you is on the same level or an optimistic hope that there is a congruent baseline from what a happy medium can be established?

Every time you give you heart to someone, is there an unwritten rule, that they will hold it like it’s a cherished, rare and completely new and a unique star just discovered. Or is love a gamble that we constantly take on, hoping for an outcome different then the past solar system discovered.

What is the basis of your understanding of the commitment, and what level are you willing to go to achieve a harmonious, continuous flow of love that can be felt mentally, physically and spiritually. Are most people cut out for that level of commitment? Are you?

When people speak of Love Languages, are we defining what we need to be happy or what we expect a person can adhere to in order to co-exist within your universe. Have you ever asked yourself, are your basic needs sustainable by another person, coming into a majestic arena with past baggage and thought process conducive to surviving in an untrusting society.

What drives human beings to search for the unknown hoping to find new discovery and heightened levels of accountability. Is it the quest of mankind to cohabitate with primary purpose to reproduce and extend life as we know it.

People are often attracted or impressed by someone’s intelligence, polished manners or talents, and come to an intrinsic level to love them. They assume that that person must have other good qualities as well that are balanced by a multitude of positive traits. Such a naΓ―ve belief can ultimately lead to sorrow because having one or more remarkable qualities does not necessarily make a person loving or caring. On the contrary, someone with exceptional talents may be self-centred, arrogant or callous about others’ feelings.

‘Self-confidence is the first prerequisite to great undertakings’ – Samuel Johnson

-Astro-Nut πŸ‘¨πŸ½β€πŸš€

4 responses

  1. Pooja G Avatar

    I very much agree with your concluding paragraph. Over the years I’ve realised that just because someone is polished and speaks sweetly does not mean they are good people. In fact, many only say what you want to hear but don’t follow through with their promises.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. sigmablu1914 Avatar

      I agree with you, but I have found that, either polished or not, people are just people, and defined by life experiences that manifest into their understanding of what reality is.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Kymber Hawke Avatar

    I really enjoyed reading your thoughts on this topic. I think you’re right in what you say, and there is a lot there to think about.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. sigmablu1914 Avatar

      Thank you and I appreciate your comment

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to sigmablu1914 Cancel reply